See Part I to start at the beginning.
The Story So Far (Part I through Part XI):
By late September 2016, the most extensive political coverup in U.S. history hit its peak. Every major government institution shielded Hillary Clinton from prosecution while framing Donald Trump. President Obama directed FBI surveillance based on fabricated intel from Clinton’s campaign, funneled through Christopher Steele and Fusion GPS. FBI agents Peter Strzok and Lisa Page bragged about an "insurance policy" against Trump, suppressing evidence and inventing crimes. The FISA Court was misled into approving surveillance of Americans based on fake foreign intelligence. Justice Department official Bruce Ohr acted as a go-between for his Fusion GPS-employed wife and British operative Christopher Steele, laundering opposition research into federal probes.
FBI Director James Comey cleared Clinton despite clear evidence of security breaches. Deputy Director Andrew McCabe—whose wife got $700,000 from Clinton ally Terry McAuliffe—blocked investigations into Clinton Foundation corruption. Meanwhile, CIA operative Stefan Halper ran entrapment schemes against Trump aides, while media outlets spun false intel to justify more surveillance.
FBI lawyers worked with Democratic operatives, burying evidence as "politically sensitive" to shield Clinton from oversight. A two-tiered justice system had emerged: the connected were untouchable, while candidate Trump faced relentless persecution.
September 26, 2016
The NYPD's seizure of Anthony Weiner's laptop during their investigation into his sexting with underage girls inadvertently uncovered the evidence that FBI officials had been desperately trying to hide. The laptop contained hundreds of thousands of emails that could expose the entire Clinton coverup operation.
"We need to process this laptop immediately," an NYPD detective told his supervisor as they inventoried Weiner's electronic devices.
"Oh boy, this isn't just about Weiner anymore," his supervisor replied after seeing the massive cache of Clinton-related emails.
The laptop discovery represented the FBI's worst nightmare: evidence of Clinton's crimes discovered by local law enforcement who weren't part of the federal coverup operation and might actually pursue prosecution.
September 28, 2016
Peter Strzok's text to Lisa Page about the hundreds of thousands of Clinton emails found on Weiner's laptop revealed the FBI leadership's panic about evidence they couldn't control. The emails had been auto-forwarded by Huma Abedin, creating a digital paper trail that bypassed FBI oversight.
"Holy shit, there are hundreds of thousands of Clinton emails on this thing," Strzok texted Page after the McCabe briefing.
"Can we control the narrative?" Page replied, her concern focused on damage control rather than law enforcement.
"We're working on it," Strzok assured her, though both agents understood that NYPD's discovery threatened to expose their entire protection operation.
The Weiner laptop represented a new tranche of evidence that could destroy the carefully constructed fiction that Clinton had been thoroughly investigated and exonerated.
September 28, 2016 (Same Day)
Andrew McCabe's later claim to the Inspector General that he "didn't remember anything about the [Weiner] laptop" seemed to be perjury designed to hide his systematic obstruction of the investigation. McCabe was informed immediately about the laptop but chose to bury the evidence.
"Sir, this laptop could change everything," an FBI agent told McCabe during their briefing about the Weiner discovery.
"Then we need to make sure it changes nothing," McCabe replied, his tone making clear that the Clinton email case was closed.
McCabe's selective amnesia about the most significant evidence discovery in the Clinton investigation was telling.
September 28, 2016 (Later)
James Comey's claim that his decision to exonerate Clinton wasn't made until after her interview was contradicted by overwhelming evidence that the decision had been predetermined months earlier. The draft exoneration statement had been written before key witnesses were even interviewed.
"Director, how can you say the decision wasn't made when we have drafts from months ago?" an FBI lawyer asked Comey during their legal review.
"Those were just planning documents," Comey replied, his answer revealing the predetermined nature of the entire investigation.
Comey's false claim about timing was designed to create the appearance of thorough investigation while hiding the fact that Clinton's protection had been decided long before evidence was even collected.
September 28, 2016 (Continuing)
McCabe's burial of the Weiner laptop investigation in the crucial month before the election represented obstruction of justice at the highest levels of the FBI. The Deputy Director was actively suppressing evidence that could affect electoral outcomes.
"We can't let this laptop derail the election," McCabe told his senior staff as they discussed containment strategies.
You could have heard a pin drop. No one said a word.
The laptop burial was criminal obstruction disguised as investigative prioritization, designed to ensure Clinton's election despite evidence of her crimes.
September 29, 2016
Obama For America's $700,000 payment to Perkins Coie on the same day FBI agents worked to secure Weiner's laptop didn’t appear to be coincidental.
"The timing is weird," a campaign finance investigator noted as he reviewed the OFA expenditure.
"Everything about this operation is weird," his colleague replied, understanding that the payment was part of a broader operation.
The payment revealed the integration of campaign financing, legal representation, and evidence suppression into a single coordinated operation designed to protect Clinton and Obama from criminal exposure.
September 29, 2016 (Same Day)
FBI Attorney Sally Moyer's intervention to prevent the Southern District of New York from obtaining a warrant to search the Weiner laptop was obstruction of justice disguised as jurisdictional coordination. Moyer was protecting the FBI's coverup operation from outside interference.
"SDNY wants to search the laptop immediately," an FBI agent told Moyer.
"Tell them it's an FBI matter now," Moyer replied, her legal authority being used to suppress rather than facilitate investigation.
Moyer's intervention ensured that the laptop evidence would remain under FBI control, where it could be managed to protect Clinton rather than expose her crimes.
October 3, 2016
The FBI's seizure of Weiner's laptop from SDNY represented the Bureau's successful assertion of control over evidence that threatened their entire operation. By taking custody of the laptop, the FBI ensured that its contents could be managed politically rather than investigated legally.
"We need to control this evidence," an FBI supervisor told his team as they took possession of the laptop from SDNY.
"Control it how?" an agent asked.
"National security," came the reply, shutting down the conversation.
The FBI seizure wasn't about investigation—it was about suppression, ensuring that potentially explosive evidence remained under the control of officials committed to protecting Clinton.
October 6, 2016
Paul Sperry's New York Post report about veteran FBI agents being "in revolt" over the Clinton whitewash revealed the internal resistance to the Bureau's corruption. Line agents understood they were participating in a conspiracy to obstruct justice.
"This isn't what I signed up for," a veteran FBI agent told Sperry during their interview.
"We're supposed to investigate crimes, not cover them up," another agent added, his frustration with leadership evident.
The agent revolt represented the last vestige of FBI integrity, with career investigators recognizing that their institution had been corrupted beyond recognition by political operatives masquerading as law enforcement officials.
October 7, 2016
WikiLeaks' release of John Podesta's emails exposed the holistic coordination between Clinton's campaign, foreign intelligence operatives, and government officials. The emails revealed the scope of the political warfare operation against American democracy.
"These emails show everything," a WikiLeaks volunteer told Julian Assange as they prepared the Podesta release.
"That's why they'll try to bury them with other stories," Assange replied, his understanding of information warfare evident in his timing concerns.
The Podesta emails provided documentary evidence of the conspiracy that intelligence agencies were desperately trying to hide, revealing the coordination between campaign officials, foreign operatives, and government agencies.
October 7, 2016 (Same Day)
The release of the 2005 Access Hollywood tape featuring Trump's crude comments about women was perfectly timed to distract from the Podesta email revelations and provide media cover for the Russian hacking narrative. The coordination wasn't coincidental.
"The timing is perfect," a Clinton campaign official noted as they monitored both the Access Hollywood story and the Podesta leak coverage.
"Almost like someone planned it," his colleague replied, understanding that media coordination was part of the broader political warfare operation.
The tape release represented information warfare designed to control news cycles and minimize the impact of evidence that exposed Clinton campaign corruption and coordination with foreign intelligence services.
October 7, 2016 (Later)
The Obama administration's official accusation that Russia was meddling in the presidential election represented the weaponization of diplomatic relations to support manufactured intelligence narratives. The administration was making international accusations based on evidence they knew was fabricated.
"Are we really going to accuse Russia based on intelligence we manufactured?" a State Department official asked during the policy coordination meeting.
"We're past the point of worrying about that," came the reply from the White House liaison.
The Russian meddling accusation was political warfare disguised as diplomatic communication, designed to legitimize surveillance operations and distract from evidence of domestic corruption. It also risked an international incident with a nuclear power.
October 12, 2016
The FBI's discovery of 650,000 emails on Weiner's laptop, including thousands forwarded from Huma Abedin's Clinton email system, represented a new evidence cache that could expose the entire corruption scandal.
"There are more emails here than in our entire Clinton investigation," Peter Strzok told Andrew McCabe and Lisa Page.
"How many of them are classified?" McCabe asked, his concern focused on potential exposure rather than prosecution.
"We're not sure," Strzok replied. "No one’s looked."
The emails represented Huma Abedin's insurance policy—evidence of Clinton's crimes that could protect her if she was abandoned by the operation. The FBI's refusal to examine the emails revealed their commitment to protection rather than prosecution.
The Weiner laptop discovery had created an existential crisis for the entire corruption operation, with hundreds of thousands of emails threatening to expose not just Clinton's crimes but the FBI's coverup of those crimes.
The discovery of Abedin's "insurance" emails represented the ultimate irony: evidence preserved to protect one conspirator from abandonment had instead exposed the entire conspiracy to potential discovery.
A dramatization of real events. Based upon The Timeline of Treason. Part I below. Enjoying Spygate? Please consider a paid subscription.
