The Illustrated Spygate Scandal - Part XI
The first political coup in American history
See Part I to start at the beginning.
The Story So Far (Part I through Part X):
By September 2016, the most comprehensive political surveillance operation in American history had reached full operational deployment, with President Obama personally coordinating FBI activities while CIA operatives systematically manufactured evidence against Trump associates through foreign intelligence channels. Hillary Clinton's email investigation had been transformed into an elaborate protection racket where FBI agents like Peter Strzok openly withheld evidence of her crimes from Congress while A.G. Loretta Lynch predetermined her exoneration, creating a two-tiered justice system where the politically connected operated above the law.
The "Crossfire Hurricane" investigation, based entirely on Christopher Steele's fabricated dossier that Clinton had commissioned, represented the weaponization of the Executive Branch against Democrats’ political opponents. Foreign intelligence operative Stefan Halper had begun entrapping Trump associates while DOJ official Bruce Ohr coordinated between his Fusion GPS-employed wife and British intelligence.
Worse still, CIA Director John Brennan was personally briefing Obama on the operation, while FBI agents Peter Strzok and Lisa Page openly declared their intention to implement an "insurance policy" against Trump's potential victory. With Obama’s support, law enforcement agencies had been transformed into the Stasi .
September 7, 2016
NBC's Matt Lauer's question to Trump about his relationship with Vladimir Putin during the town hall was perfectly timed to support the intelligence community's manufactured narrative. The media coordination with surveillance operations had become seamless, with journalists asking questions designed to create soundbites that would later justify FISA applications.
"Why are reporters all asking me about Putin?" Trump wondered after the broadcast.
The questions weren't journalistic curiosity—they were intelligence operations designed to create the public record that would justify political surveillance. The mainstream media had allied with the federal government to stop Donald Trump - once and for all.
September 8, 2016
James Comey's private notation that the Intelligence Community had only "Low" confidence that Guccifer and WikiLeaks disclosures came from Russia was the smoking gun that proved the entire Russian hacking narrative was manufactured. Even FBI leadership knew the allegations lacked credible evidence.
"So we're basing everything on intelligence we don't actually believe?" an FBI supervisor asked Comey during their classified briefing.
"Belief isn't the point," Comey replied.
The low confidence assessment revealed that senior FBI officials knew their Russian collusion investigation was predicated on falsehoods, yet they continued the operation. Doing so would ensure their promotions when Hillary assumed the Presidency in 2017.
September 8, 2016 (Same Day)
The New York Times' report that Paul Combetta had mass-deleted Clinton's emails despite preservation requests should have triggered immediate obstruction of justice charges. Instead, Combetta's crimes were buried while the FBI focused on manufacturing evidence against Trump associates.
"So Clinton's IT guy admits to destroying evidence and we do nothing?" a line FBI agent asked his supervisor.
"Some people wear shields," came the reply that had become standard at FBI headquarters.
Combetta's immunity deal protected him from prosecution while ensuring his silence about the systematic destruction of evidence that should have sent Clinton to federal prison. The coverup was more important than the crime.
September 10, 2016
Peter Strzok's admission to withholding evidence of Clinton's crimes from Congress was a felony that James Comey and other FBI officials ignored because they were complicit in the same coverup. The Bureau had abandoned law enforcement in favor of political protection.
"We can't give Congress everything," Strzok told his team during their evidence review. "Some things need to stay classified."
What was Strzok was really saying? That evidence of Clinton's crimes needed to be hidden from Congress to protect the broader political objective. Everyone in the room knew.
September 11, 2016
Strzok's classification of the Anthony Weiner laptop as "politically sensitive" wasn't about protecting national security—it was about hiding evidence of Clinton's crimes until after the election. The laptop contained thousands of Clinton emails that could have exposed the entire coverup.
"This laptop could destroy everything," Strzok told Lisa Page as they reviewed the Weiner evidence.
"Then we classify it and bury it," Page replied, understanding that evidence management was more important than evidence analysis.
The politically sensitive classification ensured that Clinton's emails on Weiner's laptop would remain hidden from investigators until it was too late to affect the election outcome.
September 11, 2016 (Same Day)
Hillary Clinton's collapse at the World Trade Center memorial service after mysteriously disappearing from public appearances revealed the physical toll of managing the most comprehensive coverup in political history. Her illness wasn't just medical—it was the stress of coordinating multiple criminal conspiracies.
"She's been under enormous pressure," a Clinton aide told Secret Service agents as they helped her into the van.
The pressure wasn't from campaigning—it was stress. Systemic criminality was literally making her sick.
September 14, 2016
Stefan Halper's direct question to George Papadopoulos—"you know about hacking the emails from Russia, right?"—was an obvious intelligence entrapment attempt that failed when Papadopoulos denied any knowledge of Russian collusion. The denial was exculpatory evidence that would never appear in FISA applications.
"I don't know anything about Russian hacking," Papadopoulos told Halper, his honest response creating a problem for intelligence operatives.
"Interesting," Halper replied, his recording equipment capturing evidence that contradicted the surveillance operation's basic premise.
The exculpatory evidence was immediately classified and hidden from FISA judges, ensuring that surveillance warrants would be based only on manufactured intelligence rather than actual facts.
September 15, 2016
Christopher Steele's meeting with FBI agents in Rome represented the formal merger of foreign intelligence operations and domestic surveillance activities. The Bureau was now directly coordinating with foreign spies to manufacture evidence against the Democrats’ opponents.
"We need you to keep producing intelligence reports," the FBI agents told Steele during their Rome meeting.
"How much intelligence do you need?" Steele asked, understanding that quantity mattered more than quality.
"Just keep going until we tell you to stop," came the reply.
September 15, 2016 (Same Day)
James Baker's receipt of information from Democratic operatives and his decision to pass it to the dossier investigation team revealed the FBI's systematic coordination with partisan political sources. The Bureau's chief lawyer was laundering Democratic opposition research into official investigations.
"Where did this file come from?" an FBI agent asked Baker as he reviewed the Democratic material.
"Sources and methods," Baker replied, curtly cutting off any discussion.
Baker's actions represented the complete corruption of FBI legal processes, with the Bureau's top lawyer actively coordinating with political operators to manufacture evidence against their targets.
September 15, 2016 (Later That Day)
The FISA Court's approval of surveillance on Trump's campaign based on the Russian dossier represented the successful corruption of judicial oversight through foreign intelligence laundering. Federal judges had been deceived into authorizing surveillance based on fabricated evidence.
"The foreign intelligence makes this application much stronger," a FISA judge noted as he approved the surveillance warrant.
What the judge didn't know was that the "foreign intelligence" was actually Clinton opposition research laundered through foreign intelligence operatives specifically to deceive the court.
The FISA approval represented the successful weaponization of national security authorities against American citizens engaged only in politics.
September 21, 2016
Christopher Steele's briefings to reporters from the New York Times, Washington Post, and Yahoo News represented the systematic coordination between foreign intelligence operatives and American media organizations. Journalists were being used to launder manufactured intelligence into public narrative.
"Should we verify these claims?" a Times reporter asked.
"You can't," Steele replied. "But you can report that well-placed intelligence sources are certain."
The media briefings weren't about journalism—they were about information warfare, designed to create public support for political surveillance operations.
September 22, 2016
Senator Dianne Feinstein and Representative Adam Schiff's joint statement about Russian hacking provided the political cover that surveillance operations needed from Democratic leadership. The statement was coordinated with intelligence agencies to create the appearance of concern from both House and Senate.
"Perfect," Comey said to his staff as he reviewed the Feinstein-Schiff release.
The joint statement was based on a circular process where surveillance justified itself through political support.
September 23, 2016
Hillary Clinton's campaign press release touting the "bombshell report" on Trump-Russia ties was the perfect completion of the intelligence laundering circle. The campaign was promoting media reports based on intelligence they had manufactured through foreign operatives.
"This is brilliant," Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook told his team. "We create the intelligence, leak it to media, then promote the media reports as independent confirmation."
The press release represented the ultimate in political cynicism: a campaign promoting evidence of their opponent's corruption that they had literally manufactured themselves through foreign intelligence operatives.
September 23, 2016 (Same Day)
Michael Isikoff's Yahoo News report based on the Russian dossier represented the successful laundering of manufactured intelligence through mainstream media. The article provided the independent media confirmation that surveillance operations needed to justify expanded authorities.
"This gives us the media corroboration we need for the FISA renewals," McCabe observed as he reviewed Isikoff's article.
September 26, 2016
Carter Page's letter to James Comey objecting to leaks about FBI surveillance created the pretext that Peter Strzok needed to directly interview and further entrap the Trump advisor. Page's attempt to defend himself became evidence of suspicious behavior.
"Page's letter actually helps us," Strzok texted Lisa Page. "Now we have pretext to interview him directly."
Page's Constitutional right to due process was being transformed into evidence of guilt by the FBI.
September 26, 2016 (Same Day)
Stefan Halper's fourth contract from the Office of Net Assessment, bringing his total payments to $411,000, revealed the systematic funding of intelligence operations against American citizens through Pentagon contractors. The military was financing political surveillance operations.
"That's a lot of money for academic research," a Pentagon auditor noted as he reviewed Halper's contracts.
"It's not academic research," his supervisor replied. "It's operational support."
The Pentagon contracts provided official cover for CIA operations against American citizens, using military funding to finance political surveillance.
The intelligence operation had achieved complete success: FISA surveillance was operational, media narrative was established, Congressional support was secured, and foreign intelligence coordination was formalized. FBI agents were openly withholding exculpatory evidence while manufacturing process crimes, judges were approving surveillance based on fabricated foreign intelligence, and media organizations were promoting stories based on garbage.
President Obama and CIA director John Brennan were coordinating the entire operation while Hillary Clinton's campaign promoted evidence they had created through foreign operatives, representing the most comprehensive corruption of American institutions in the nation's history.
The American people were about to discover that their government had been captured by a permanent ruling class - who would destroy any opposition regardless of elections.
A dramatization of real events. Based upon The Timeline of Treason. Part I below.
Have you calculated how many posts to bring this through the Biden regime? This is a great read, I have forgotten so much. There were so many players and misdirection. Sadly the damage to our country will not be known for some time.
There MUST be prosecutions writ large of these demons. Perhaps when 99% of the public understands the last 10 years have been all a lie they are going to be pissed. We have all paid dearly.